๐Ÿ”ฅ Eaton Fire Tax Lane Finder

Which Lane Are You In?

4 questions. 60 seconds. You'll see the exact tax math for your situation โ€” not all ten scenarios. Just yours.

Question 1 of 4

Do you own the home that was destroyed or damaged?

Renting vs. owning changes everything โ€” including whether a tax deduction even exists.

Lane 1 โ€” Gain Client

Your situation: well-insured, insurance likely exceeds your basis

The entire question for you is the ยง1033 election. You do not have a casualty loss. You have a gain โ€” possibly a large one once Edison settles in 2027. Here's the math.

Your scenario setup: Home purchased 2007 at $350K + $50K improvements = $400K adjusted basis. Insurance proceeds: $950K. Gain after ยง121 exclusion ($500K for MFJ): $50K taxable on insurance alone. Edison settles in 2027 for $500K โ€” pushing total property proceeds to $1.3M and total gain to $400K above the ยง121 cap. Combined income: $300K wages. CA resident, MFJ.

Person A โ€” Makes the ยง1033 Election โœ“

Person A's preparer attaches a written ยง1033 election statement to the 2025 return, deferring the $50K gain from insurance. In 2027 when Edison pays $500K, the total property gain reaches $400K โ€” but the ยง1033 election covers it all, deferred into the replacement property. Only the ordinary Edison components ($70K) are taxable.

ItemAmountTreatmentTax
2025 conversion gain after ยง121$50,000ยง1033 deferred$0
2027 Edison โ€” property gain$400,000ยง1033 deferred$0
2027 Edison โ€” physical injury$200,000ยง104 excluded$0
2027 Edison โ€” ordinary components$70,000Ordinary income$23,310
Total tax from the fire$23,310
Person A total: $23,310. The ยง1033 election defers the entire property gain. Clean, predictable, and fully protected โ€” as long as replacement property is acquired within the 4-year window.

Person B โ€” No ยง1033 Election โœ—

Same facts. Person B's preparer doesn't attach the election statement. The $50K gain is taxed in 2025. When Edison pays in 2027, the $400K property gain has no ยง1033 protection and is taxed as capital gain.

ItemAmountTreatmentTax
2025 conversion gain after ยง121$50,000Capital gain (no election)$12,150
2027 Edison โ€” property gain$400,000Capital gain โ€” no protection$97,200
2027 Edison โ€” physical injury$200,000ยง104 excluded$0
2027 Edison โ€” ordinary components$70,000Ordinary income$23,310
Total tax from the fire$132,660
Person B total: $132,660. No ยง1033 election = no protection. The entire gain โ€” insurance gain and Edison gain โ€” is fully taxable capital gain.
โš–๏ธ Your Lane Head-to-Head: Person A vs. Person B
Person A
ยง1033 election made
Person B
No election
Total 2025 tax
$0 (deferred)
$12,150
Total 2027 tax
$23,310
$120,510
Total tax from the fire
$23,310
$132,660
๐Ÿ“Œ The ยง1033 election is worth $109,350 โ€” entirely from one written statement attached to the return. This is not a form. It does not file itself. If your 2025 return was filed without it, call your preparer today.

Your action item

Confirm the ยง1033 election statement is on your 2025 return. If you haven't filed yet, it needs to be drafted before you file. If you already filed without it, an amendment may still be possible. A tax consult will confirm which position you're in and whether the election is salvageable.

Book an Eaton Fire Tax Consult
Lane 2 โ€” Underinsured, Large Loss

You have a real casualty loss โ€” and a real timing decision

Your insurance genuinely didn't cover your adjusted basis. Filing the loss in 2025 gets you a large refund now โ€” but Edison's 2027 payment will come back as ยง111 ordinary income. Here's the full two-year math.

Your scenario setup: Home purchased 2019 at $750K + $50K improvements = $800K adjusted basis. Insurance proceeds: $400K. Apparent loss before Edison: $400K. Edison settles in 2027 for $300K. Combined income: $300K wages. CA resident, MFJ.

Person C โ€” Files the Loss in 2025 (Large Loss)

Person C claims the $400K loss on the 2025 return. It wipes out $300K wages entirely, creates a $100K NOL. Refund: $99,900. Note: this position assumes the portion claimed wasn't subject to a reasonable prospect of Edison recovery โ€” a standard practitioners apply differently.

ItemAmountTreatmentTax
2025 wages$300,000Ordinaryโ€”
2025 casualty loss($400,000)Wipes wages + $100K NOLRefund $99,900
2027 Edison property โ€” ยง111 recapture$220,000Ordinary income (recapture)$73,260
2027 Edison ordinary components$40,000Ordinary income$13,320
2027 NOL offset on recaptureโ€”Partial cushion($9,110)
Net tax positionAhead ~$22,430 (+time value ~$30K)
Person C net: approximately +$22,430 ahead (plus ~$8K time value on cash = ~$30K effective benefit). The argument is cash flow โ€” nearly $100K in hand during displacement. The cost: $220K of Edison property income taxed ordinary instead of non-taxable.

The alternative โ€” Wait for Edison

If Person C waits, filing an open transaction disclosure in 2025, the Edison property payment in 2027 applies against the remaining loss cleanly โ€” no recapture, no character conversion. Total tax: $13,320 on just the ordinary components.

Waiting: $13,320 total. No ยง111 exposure. The cash flow cost is real โ€” no $99,900 in 2025 โ€” but the 2027 position is clean and the ordinary income problem disappears.
โš–๏ธ Large Loss: File in 2025 vs. Wait
File in 2025
Wait for Edison
2025 refund
$99,900
$0
2027 extra tax
$77,470
$13,320
Net result
+~$30K (w/time value)
$13,320 total
๐Ÿ“Œ If you urgently needed the $99,900 during displacement, filing early has a real financial case โ€” approximately $30K ahead including time value. If you didn't need it, waiting at $13,320 total is the cleaner outcome. The decision is cash flow vs. character.

Your action item

The key question now: did you file the loss in 2025? If yes, you need to understand the ยง111 recapture position before Edison settles. If not, a protective open transaction disclosure and ยง1033 election should be in place. A tax consult will confirm the right move.

Book an Eaton Fire Tax Consult
Lane 2 โ€” Underinsured, Smaller Loss

Your apparent loss may disappear when Edison settles

A smaller gap between basis and insurance looks like a loss now โ€” but if Edison's payment is large enough, it can eliminate the loss entirely and even create a small gain. Filing early here is almost never the right move.

Your scenario setup: Home purchased 2019 at $750K + $50K improvements = $800K adjusted basis. Insurance proceeds: $650K. Apparent loss before Edison: $150K. Edison settles in 2027 for $300K. Combined income: $300K wages. CA resident, MFJ.

Person D โ€” Waits for Edison โœ“

Person D files an open transaction disclosure in 2025, makes a protective ยง1033 election, and waits. When Edison pays in 2027, the total property recovery ($650K insurance + $220K Edison property) = $870K โ€” which actually exceeds the $800K basis by $70K. The apparent loss has become a small gain.

ItemAmountTreatmentTax
2025 returnโ€”Open transaction disclosure only$0
2027 net property gain (after ยง121 n/a)$70,000ยง1033 deferred if reinvesting$0
2027 Edison ordinary components$40,000Ordinary income$13,320
Total tax from the fire$13,320
Person D total: $13,320. No recapture. No character conversion. The ยง1033 deferral protects the unexpected $70K gain. Clean and predictable.
What happens if Person D had filed the $150K loss in 2025? They'd have gotten a $49,950 refund. But when Edison pays in 2027, the ยง111 recapture rule fires. The $220K Edison property payment is ordinary income to the extent the prior deduction produced tax benefit. Net: ahead only ~$10K including time value โ€” and the $220K Edison payment is taxed at ordinary rates instead of being non-taxable. For this size loss, it's not worth it.

Your action item

If you haven't filed yet: file an open transaction disclosure, not a loss claim. If you already filed a loss on a small-gap situation, you need to understand what ยง111 recapture will look like in 2027. A tax consult will map this out before Edison settles.

Book an Eaton Fire Tax Consult
โš ๏ธ Lane 3 โ€” Underinsured with Hidden Gain

Stop. You may have a gain, not a loss.

You feel underinsured. You can't rebuild what you had. But feeling underinsured relative to replacement cost is not the same as having a tax loss. The only thing that matters is insurance vs. your adjusted basis.

The critical check: What did you pay for the home, plus every capital improvement โ€” additions, remodels, new systems? That total is your adjusted basis. If your insurance payout exceeded that number, you have a gain. ยง121 may cover it entirely. But filing a casualty loss when you have a gain is very likely filing an incorrect return.
Your scenario setup: Home purchased 1998 at $280K + $70K improvements = $350K adjusted basis. Home FMV before fire: $1,400,000. FAIR Plan insurance: $700K. They feel underinsured vs. the $1.4M home โ€” but $700K vs. $350K basis = $350K gain, covered entirely by ยง121. Edison settles in 2027 for $400K. Combined income: $300K wages. CA resident, MFJ.

Person E โ€” Correct Analysis, ยง1033 Election โœ“

ItemAmountTreatmentTax
2025 insurance gain (after ยง121 covers $350K)$0ยง121 exclusion$0
ยง1033 election attached to returnโ€”Written statement filedProtected
2027 Edison property gain ($150K above ยง121 cap)$150,000ยง1033 deferred$0
2027 Edison ordinary components$50,000Ordinary income$16,650
Total tax from the fire$16,650
Person E total: $16,650. Correct analysis. ยง1033 defers the property gain. Pays only on ordinary Edison components.

Person F โ€” Filed an Incorrect Casualty Loss โœ—

Person F's preparer compared FMV ($1.4M) to insurance ($700K) and claimed a $400K loss. The correct calculation โ€” basis vs. insurance โ€” shows a gain, not a loss. The $400K casualty loss is almost certainly incorrect.

ItemAmountTreatmentTax
2025 incorrect casualty loss claimed($400,000)Very likely incorrect"Refund" $99,900
2027 Edison property โ€” ยง111 recapture$300,000Ordinary income (recapture)$99,900
2027 Edison ordinary components$50,000Ordinary income$16,650
Penalty exposure (20% accuracy)โ€”Audit / penalty riskAdditional
Net cash positionโˆ’$13,100 + penalty/audit risk
Person F: Got a $99,900 "refund." Owes ~$113,000 extra in 2027. Net: โˆ’$13,100. And that's before accuracy-related penalties (20%), interest from the original filing date, and the audit risk of an incorrect return. If you're in this situation, the question is whether an amended return before 2027 makes sense.
โš ๏ธ Lane 3: Correct vs. Incorrect
Person E โ€” Correct
Person F โ€” Incorrect
Total tax / net position
$16,650
โˆ’$13,100 + penalties
Return correctness
โœ“ Correct
โœ— Very likely incorrect
โš ๏ธ Person F is roughly net-neutral on dollars โ€” but on an incorrect return. Audit risk + penalties can make the actual outcome far worse. Person E pays $16,650 and is fully protected. Before assuming you have a loss: calculate your actual adjusted basis.
If your preparer is treating you like Lane 2 but your insurance exceeds your adjusted basis, they may be putting an incorrect return in front of you. This is the most common mistake in Eaton Fire tax planning โ€” and it has audit consequences that follow you for years.

Your action item

Calculate your actual adjusted basis before anything else. A tax consult will verify your basis, confirm your lane, and โ€” if you've already filed a loss โ€” determine whether an amended return before Edison settles is the right move.

Book an Eaton Fire Tax Consult
Lane 4 โ€” Smoke Damage, Large FMV Decline

Your home is standing โ€” and the math for filing early is strong

Large FMV decline relative to what Edison is likely to pay is the one scenario where filing early produces the clearest financial benefit across all ten people.

Your scenario setup: FMV before fire: $1,200K. FMV after: $700K. FMV decline: $500K. Insurance remediation: $100K. Net casualty loss: $400K. Edison settles in 2027 for $200K (split $130K property / $30K ordinary / $40K injury). Combined income: $300K wages. CA resident, MFJ.

Person G โ€” Files the Large Loss in 2025 โœ“

ItemAmountTreatmentTax
2025 casualty loss (FMV decline โˆ’ insurance)($400,000)Wipes wages + $100K NOLRefund $99,900
2027 Edison property โ€” ยง111 recapture$130,000Ordinary (partial recapture)$43,290
2027 Edison ordinary + injury$70,000Mixed (injury excluded)$9,990
NOL carryforward cushionโ€”Partial offset($21,180)
Net ahead after two years+$68,730
Person G: +$68,730 ahead. This is the strongest financial case for early filing across all ten scenarios. The large loss relative to Edison's property payment means recapture is proportionally small. Nearly $100K in hand during displacement.

Your action item

The math favors filing โ€” but the FMV decline needs to be properly documented and the "reasonable prospect of recovery" analysis needs to be done before claiming. A tax consult will confirm the position and document the defensible number.

Book an Eaton Fire Tax Consult
Lane 4 โ€” Smoke Damage, Moderate FMV Decline

Your FMV decline is likely covered by Edison โ€” wait

A moderate FMV decline from smoke or partial damage often gets fully covered by Edison's property settlement. Filing the loss early puts you in the ยง111 recapture trap for a gain that probably wasn't worth the risk.

Your scenario setup: FMV before: $1,200K. FMV after: $1,000K. FMV decline: $200K. Insurance: $80K. Net loss: $120K. Edison settles in 2027 for $200K ($130K property / $30K ordinary / $40K injury). Combined income: $300K wages. CA resident, MFJ.

Person H โ€” Waits for Edison โœ“

Person H waits. In 2027, the $130K Edison property payment covers the $120K loss and then some. Total property recovery slightly exceeds the FMV decline โ€” no net loss to claim. The $10K excess reduces basis. Only ordinary components are taxable.

ItemAmountTreatmentTax
2025 returnโ€”Open transaction disclosure only$0
2027 net property: recovery exceeds lossโ€”No loss; excess reduces basis$0
2027 Edison ordinary components$30,000Ordinary income$9,990
Total tax from the fire$9,990
Person H total: $9,990. Clean. No recapture. The FMV decline was fully absorbed by Edison's property payment.

Your action item

File an open transaction disclosure in 2025 and wait for Edison. Confirm the FMV decline is properly documented (before/after appraisal or comparable sales data). A tax consult will confirm the right position and what to prepare before Edison settles.

Book an Eaton Fire Tax Consult
Lane 5 โ€” Renter

No casualty loss is available โ€” but you have one lever

The TCJA eliminated personal casualty loss deductions. You cannot deduct your contents loss in 2025 or 2027, regardless of how much you lost. But how your Edison settlement is allocated can save over $13,000.

Your scenario: No real property. Contents lost. Insurance paid some but not all. Edison settles for $150K in 2027: $70K property/contents components, $40K emotional distress, $40K physical injury. Combined income: $300K wages. CA resident, MFJ.
Edison componentAmountTreatmentTax
Property / contents recovery$70,000Not taxable (below basis)$0
Physical injury โ€” documented$40,000ยง104 excluded$0
Emotional distress (flowing from physical injury)$40,000ยง104 excluded if injury documented$0
Tax if physical injury documented$0
If physical injury is documented before signing: $0 tax on the Edison settlement. The emotional distress allocation shifts from ordinary income to a ยง104 exclusion flowing from physical injury.
If emotional distress is NOT tied to documented physical injury: The $40K emotional distress component is ordinary income โ€” taxed at ~33.3% = $13,320 in additional tax. This allocation is set when you sign the agreement. It cannot be changed after signing.

Your action item

Before you sign anything with Edison: gather documentation of any physical injury โ€” respiratory issues, smoke inhalation treatment, hospital or urgent care visits, anything showing bodily harm. That documentation is worth $13,320 in this scenario. It closes the moment you sign. A tax consult will help you understand how to position the settlement allocation before it's final.

Book an Eaton Fire Tax Consult