🔥 Eaton Fire Tax Series Tax Controversy March 3, 2026

Don't Rush
to Deduct.

By Adam Libman, CRTP · California Registered Tax Preparer · 25 years in tax controversy

Most Eaton Fire survivors instinctively want to claim the casualty loss on their 2025 return — and most of them shouldn't. Under IRC §165, a loss is only deductible when "sustained," which requires all claims to be settled with no remaining prospect of recovery; as long as the Edison lawsuit is active, most cases are not there. This post is for Eaton Fire homeowners, renters, and smoke-damage households making filing decisions right now who need to understand why filing early often costs more than it saves.

🔥 Eaton Fire Tax Series
Read all 15 posts in this series → Every Eaton Fire tax issue mapped in one place — with the unique angle each post takes.
⚡ Law Updated — March 2026
OBBBA (July 2025): Eaton Fire Is a Qualified Disaster Loss — Federal Floor Eliminated
The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (Pub. L. 119-21, signed July 4, 2025) confirmed the Eaton Fire as a Qualified Disaster Loss. Federal casualty loss rules updated:

Federal 10% AGI floor: eliminated for qualified disaster losses
Per-event floor: $500 (down from $100)
Itemizing not required — casualty loss now available without itemizing

California has NOT conformed to OBBBA. California still applies the 10% AGI floor, the $100 per-event floor, and requires itemizing. Every Eaton Fire client now needs a federal calculation and a California calculation — they will be different numbers.
⚡ Law Updated — March 2026
2026 Payment Cliff: FDTRA Exclusion Expired December 31, 2025
The Federal Disaster Tax Relief Act wildfire payment exclusion expired December 31, 2025 under current law.

2025 payments: FDTRA exclusion may apply — analyze alongside §104 and §1033.
2026+ payments: FDTRA exclusion unavailable. Federal taxability depends entirely on §104 (physical injury allocation) and §1033 (total loss deferral). California payments remain excluded under R&TC §17138.7 through 2029.

The settlement timing decision now has a federal tax dimension it didn't have before. Clients who can settle in 2025 have one more federal tool available. Clients settling in 2026 are working with a shorter federal toolkit — but California is still fully excluded.
⚡ Law Updated — March 2026
California Law Changed: Your Edison Settlement May Be Zero California Tax
R&TC §17138.7 (SB 159, chaptered September 2025) excludes qualified wildfire settlement amounts from California gross income through 2029. For most Eaton Fire clients receiving SCE settlement payments, California income tax is zero — regardless of federal treatment. Federal and California now run on separate tracks. See our complete taxability guide for the full analysis.

These numbers are devastating to you. To us, this is what we do every day.

We make the tax side of this emotionally manageable — so you can focus on rebuilding. One consult. Clear answers. No jargon.

Book an Eaton Fire Tax Consult

My parents' house is in Sierra Madre. When the Eaton Fire came through in January 2025, their home didn't burn — but for several days, none of us knew that. Smoke damage, mandatory evacuation, ash on everything they owned. They came terrifyingly close to losing it all. I personally know more than twenty families from that area and Altadena who weren't as fortunate — people who lost their homes entirely, or lost enough that the distinction between "still standing" and "total loss" felt meaningless.

When the calls started coming in from those families in late January and February, the first question almost every one of them asked was the same: "Can I deduct this on my taxes right now?" The instinct makes complete sense. They suffered a real loss. The IRS allows casualty loss deductions. Why wait?

What most advisors miss — and what I have to walk through carefully with every one of these families — is that "I had a loss" and "I can deduct the loss right now" are two completely different legal questions. Confusing them, and rushing to file before the case is actually closed, is one of the most costly mistakes I see in post-disaster tax work.

Can I Claim an Eaton Fire Casualty Loss on My 2025 Tax Return?

Here's where it gets counterintuitive. The question is not whether you experienced a loss. You clearly did. The question is whether that loss has been "sustained" under the tax code — and those are not the same thing.

Under IRC §165, a casualty loss is deductible in the year it is sustained. The courts and the IRS have been consistent on what "sustained" requires:

Requirement 1

The Casualty Event Has Occurred

Clear for every Eaton Fire survivor. January 2025. This box is checked for everyone.

Requirement 2 — The One Almost Nobody Is Meeting Right Now

All Claims Must Be Settled With No Remaining Prospect of Recovery

"Settled" means no remaining reasonable prospect of recovery from any source — insurance, lawsuits, FEMA grants, anything. If Edison's liability is still being litigated — and it is, actively — your case is factually open. The ongoing litigation isn't a technicality. It is the substance of whether your loss is final.

The practical consequence: if you claim a $250,000 casualty loss on your 2025 return, receive a refund, and then receive a $400,000 Edison settlement two years later, the IRS applies §111. The recovery is treated as ordinary income in the year received, to the extent it produced a prior tax benefit. You do not get capital gain treatment on the recaptured piece. At combined federal and California rates approaching 50% for many Altadena households, you have converted a capital gain event into an ordinary income event — and locked that in permanently.

Don't rush to deduct. A premature loss claim may put cash in the taxpayer's hands today — but years later, it can cost dearly. The mistake is almost never recoverable once the return is filed and the refund has been spent.

Why hire Adam — not just read the blog:

✓ I stress-test your assumptions

✓ I file the return correctly

✓ I tell you which lane you're actually in

✓ I bridge your tax & legal strategy

And if the IRS ever questions it — audit representation is included. I back up what I put in writing.

Book an Eaton Fire Tax Consult

What Does "Sustained" Mean for a Wildfire Casualty Loss Deduction?

When I think about what "sustained" means in practice, I think about the families I know personally from the Sierra Madre and Altadena areas. Some have received partial insurance payments. A few have had their homeowner claims fully closed. But nearly every one of them is connected — directly or through an attorney — to the Edison litigation. That connection alone keeps the case open under the code's requirements.

There are three specific signals that tell me a case has not been sustained:

🚨

Signal 1: Any Open Insurance Claim

Coverage B (other structures), Coverage C (contents), Coverage D (additional living expenses) — if any component is still being negotiated, adjusted, or disputed with your carrier, the case is open. A partial payment is not a closed claim. An accepted partial payment with a reservation of rights letter is explicitly not a closed claim.

🚨

Signal 2: Undecided Land Disposition

If you haven't decided whether to sell your lot, rebuild, or walk away, that future land sale represents additional proceeds that change the entire gain/loss calculation. You cannot cleanly separate the structure loss from the land disposition when they are part of the same economic event.

🚨

Signal 3: Active Edison Litigation — Even If You Didn't Personally Sue

This is the one that surprises people most. You don't need to have personally retained an attorney or signed a retainer. If you are within the class of potential Edison plaintiffs — and most Eaton Fire property owners are — there is a factual prospect of third-party recovery that keeps the case open. The IRS doesn't require you to be on a client list; it requires no reasonable prospect of recovery from any source.

Should I Deduct My Eaton Fire Loss Before the Edison Lawsuit Settles?

For the vast majority of the Eaton Fire families I work with: no. Here's the math that makes this concrete.

Take a realistic Lane 2 scenario — a homeowner who is genuinely underinsured. Adjusted basis $700,000, insurance proceeds $600,000. Real economic shortfall of $100,000. Filing that loss on the 2025 return at a 37% federal + 9.3% California blended rate saves roughly $46,300 in tax today.

Then Edison settles in 2027. The homeowner's share of the settlement: $450,000. Under §111, the $100,000 that was previously deducted is recaptured as ordinary income in 2027 — approximately $46,300 in additional tax. Net benefit of the early deduction: near zero. But now that $100,000 of the Edison settlement sits in ordinary income in 2027 instead of being handled as part of a single-year analysis when the full picture was actually known. The rush cost this family their best options without saving them a dollar.

The better alternative for most 2025 filers: an open transaction disclosure. It notifies the IRS that you experienced a casualty event, that the matter is not yet concluded, and that you will report the final numbers when all proceeds are known. It does not lock in a wrong number. It does not trigger §111 recapture. It preserves every option — §1033 deferral, loss claim, net-zero analysis — until the full picture is clear.

What Happens If I Claim a Casualty Loss and Then Receive an Edison Settlement?

Based on my reading of the code and how it played out after the 2017 Thomas Fire and Woolsey Fire, the §111 recapture result is almost always worse than families expect when I walk them through it. Here's the comparison:

ApproachTax TreatmentEffective Rate
File loss now, recapture later Refund at ordinary rates today; recapture at ordinary rates on recovery Net: near zero benefit, lost optionality
§1033 election (Lane 1 gain) Gain deferred; capital gain character preserved 0–20% federal + CA on deferred gain
Open transaction disclosure No premature commitment; full analysis when case closes Best available rate once all facts are known

The open transaction approach costs you nothing except a paragraph of disclosure text on your return. It keeps every option available. It lets the insurance picture, the Edison timeline, and the replacement decision all develop before you commit to a number that follows you through 2027 and beyond.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I claim an Eaton Fire casualty loss on my 2025 tax return?
You can file a casualty loss only if the loss has been "sustained" under IRC §165 — meaning all insurance and third-party claims are settled with no remaining prospect of recovery. If the Edison liability lawsuit is still active, your case is not legally settled and a finalized casualty loss claim on your 2025 return is premature for most survivors.
What does "sustained" mean for a fire casualty loss deduction?
"Sustained" under IRC §165 requires two things: (1) the casualty event has occurred, and (2) all claims have been settled with no reasonable prospect of further recovery from insurance, lawsuits, or any other source. For Eaton Fire survivors with active Edison litigation, condition 2 is not yet met.
Should I deduct my Eaton Fire loss before the Edison lawsuit settles?
For most survivors, no. Filing early locks in a loss number that may be wrong, and any subsequent Edison recovery triggers §111 recapture as ordinary income in the recovery year. The better approach for most is an open transaction disclosure on your 2025 return, preserving your position without committing to a premature number.
What happens if I claim a casualty loss and then receive an Edison settlement?
Under IRC §111, a subsequent recovery is included in ordinary income to the extent it generated a prior tax benefit. If you claimed a $200,000 loss that saved $80,000 in tax, and then received a $350,000 Edison settlement, up to $200,000 of that recovery may be treated as ordinary income — potentially at a higher rate than capital gain treatment would have applied.
Who wrote this: Adam Libman, California Registered Tax Preparer (CRTP) — not a CPA, not an EA, not an attorney. My parents' house is in Sierra Madre; they came close to losing it. I personally know more than twenty families affected by the Eaton Fire. I've been working through these exact questions with clients since January 2025. The §165 "sustained" standard and §111 mechanics described here are longstanding tax code provisions confirmed in John Trapani's February 2026 Public Counsel webinar. Nothing here is legal advice. Work with your preparer — or reach out to me — before you file.

The blog teaches you the map.
I tell you where the landmines actually are on your map.

Reading every post here is free and you should do it. But here is what the blog cannot do for you:

Stress-test your specific assumptions. The frameworks in these posts are clean. Your situation is not. I ask the questions you don't know to ask — about your basis, your insurance allocation, your Edison timeline, your attorney's settlement language — and find the assumptions that are wrong before the IRS does.

Tell you which lane you're actually in. The five lanes look clean on paper. In real life, the facts are always messier. I've worked through 20+ Eaton Fire situations. Pattern recognition matters when a wrong lane assignment can cost you $100,000.

File the return correctly. Knowing what should go on your return and knowing how to prepare it are two different things. I prepare the return, draft the election language with your actual numbers, and make sure the IRS sees exactly what you intend them to see — not an approximation of it.

Coordinate your tax strategy with your legal strategy. Your Edison attorney is negotiating the settlement. Your insurance attorney is working the claim. Neither of them is thinking about your tax position. I bridge that gap — before you sign anything that locks in a bad outcome.

Stand behind the work if the IRS comes knocking. Audit representation is included in your fee. I back up what I put in writing. I've been doing this for 25 years and I'm not going anywhere. If we file it together and the IRS questions it, I'm in the room with you — not sending you back to figure it out alone.

25 years in tax controversy. 100,000+ returns. IRS, FTB, and CDTFA matters. Adam Libman is a California Registered Tax Preparer (CRTP) — not a CPA, EA, or attorney.

The tax side of this doesn't have to be one more thing that breaks you.

These numbers are emotional for you. For us, this is the work. We've sat across from 20+ Eaton Fire families, run the math, figured out the lane, and filed the return correctly. We make this manageable.

✓ Stress-test your assumptions

✓ Know which lane you're actually in

✓ File the return correctly

✓ Bridge your tax & legal strategy

🛡 Audit representation included. I back up what I put in writing. I've been doing this 25 years and I'm not going anywhere.

Book an Eaton Fire Tax Consult

Adam Libman is a California Registered Tax Preparer (CRTP) — not a CPA, EA, or attorney. Nothing here is legal advice.

Eaton Fire Tax Series